Menu

KIWI EARS AIROSO vs AETHER Comparison Review 

April 19, 2025 10 Min Read

Kiwi Ears has produced several impressive in-ear monitors (IEMs) in the few years they’ve been active, and the new Aether and Airoso are two very interesting IEMs around the 150 USD price mark.

The Kiwi Ears Aether is a planar magnetic in-ear monitor priced at $170 USD / €150, which features a single, notably large 15.3mm driver. The Kiwi Ears Airoso, on the other hand, is a five-driver hybrid, featuring one dynamic driver and four balanced armatures. It’s priced at $129 USD / €115. 

KIWI EARS AETHER SPECIFICATIONS

  • Driver 15.3 planar magnetic
  • Impedance 14 Ohms
  • Sensitivity 105dB SPL/mW
  • Frequency Range 20Hz-20kHz
  • Detachable cable 120 cm
  • Earphone connector type 0.78mm dual pin
  • Cable termination 3.5mm TRS jack

Current price and availability: 

KIWI EARS AIROSO SPECIFICATIONS

  • Five driver hybrid: 1 x dynamic driver + 4 x balanced armatures
  • Impedance 18Ω
  • Sensitivity 110 dB SPL/mW
  • Frequency Response 20Hz – 20kHz
  • Detachable cable 120 cm
  • Earphone connector type 0.78mm dual pin
  • Cable termination 3.5mm TRS jack
  • Weight 12g (each earbud)

Current price and availability: 

COMPARISONS 

Associated equipment: 

Who Wants to Live Forever by The Tenors (Queen)

The strings and vocals sound very natural with the Airoso. The Aether is drier with more texture and a thinner tonality with more articulate detail at the cost of the more natural, thicker timbre of the Airoso. 

Jambi by Tool 

The Aether is crisper and more textured, the Airoso thicker and fuller. They’re both great with a similar tonal balance but still different presentations. 

Smile by Pearl Jam 

The Airoso is natural-sounding and easygoing, with a pleasant roundness and smooth timbre. Sibilants are nicely tuned down but not removed. The Aether is crisper, more textured; sibilants are more pronounced, with a drier timbre and a more articulate presentation of details.

Almost Like The Blues by Leonard Cohen 

The Aether has a well-balanced presentation with very controlled and textured bass, and pronounced, detailed vocals. The Airoso has a much rounder, thicker, and more pronounced bass. The rich vocals are fuller and more organic-sounding. Cohen feels more real, but there’s less raw detail than with the Aether.

Black Crow by Cassandra Wilson 

The Airoso sounds very organic, dynamic, and natural, with slightly thick bass, rich vocals, yet a spacious and detailed presentation. The Aether is drier; the bass is more detailed but not as full-bodied, the vocals have more texture but aren’t as organic, and there’s more spaciousness but somewhat less dynamics.

Some Day My Prince Will Come by Coryell et.al. 

Even though I tend to characterise the Aether as less organic-sounding than the Airoso, it’s still a very organic and dynamic-sounding IEM, and this track sounds especially wonderful with it. The Airoso sounds quite similar, but the bass isn’t as precise, while the soundstage is slightly larger. Anyway, they are both excellent performers, and this track showcases it.

Bored by Deftones 

The Airoso presents surprisingly tight bass and great texture on the guitars. Vocals are great. The Aether, again, is drier—and in this case might be a bit too dry. Maybe not by itself, but in direct comparison to the Airoso, the Aether sound a bit too sharply cut.

As Before by Olga Konkova 

The Aether delivers a very textured cajôn bass drum experience, vocals are present and with articulate detail. The piano is crisp but not too much so. The Airoso has thicker bass and vocals, and a more rounded piano delivery.

Escape Route by Boris Blank 

Their both great, the Airoso lusher and warmer, the Aether carries more articulate detail, and sounds slightly drier. 

Mahler’s Symphony No 2 III by Paavo Järvi 

The Aether is excellent, there’s nuances and texture, great tonal balance, space between instruments, and excellent articulation of micro dynamics. The Airoso is smoother sounding, everything has a slightly rounded edge to it, but the detail is still there. 

Young Vivaldi RV 820 by Modo Antiquo 

Again, the way they render the instruments is different. The Airoso has a more organic, lusher quality to it, the Aether offers more texture and articulate detail. 

WRAPPING IT UP 

Sound Signature

When it comes to tonal balance, they are quite similarly tuned and resemble many other models from Kiwi Ears. I really like the way Kiwi Ears tune their IEMs, so that’s a positive in my book. 

They’re both quite neutrally tuned, without sounding flat or unengaging. The major difference is that the Airoso has more bass. Beyond that, the difference lies more in how they present the subtleties of the music than in any major shift in sound signature.

Treble

The treble is smoother and softer with the Airoso, while still remaining very detailed. The Aether is more articulate and crisper; however, it still sounds natural without exaggerated brightness or harshness.

Midrange

The Airoso has a lusher midrange with excellent timbre. The Aether sounds drier, leaving the listener more focused on the drier nuances and details, relatively speaking, of course. 

Bass

The bass is fuller and rounder with the Airoso, adding warmth to the presentation. However, the Aether offers significantly better quality, with superior texture, detail, and microdynamics.

Soundstage and Imaging 

Both offer a good-sized soundstage and great imaging capabilities for their price class. There’s not much of a difference between them; which one sounds larger or has better instrument positioning varies from track to track.

Detail, Dynamics, and Timbre

This is where they differ the most. While I have nothing negative to say about the detail level of the Airoso, except that the bass isn’t as revealing, the Aether articulates detail to a higher degree across the board. The bass aside, with the Airoso, the detail is there, but you have to listen more actively for it, whereas the Aether places it more upfront.

When it comes to dynamics, my general impression is that the Airoso offers more slam and macrodynamics, often aided by a fuller-sounding bass. The Aether is not lacking in dynamics, though—it’s just tighter in the lowest regions. However, it certainly offers more articulate microdynamics across the board.

The area where they differ the most, I think, is in the timbre. The Airoso is lusher, more rounded, and often feels more natural to me. The Aether has a drier quality to the presentation, sacrificing a slight bit of  flow and lushness for more explicit detail. 

CONCLUSION 

Both the Airoso and Aether are excellent IEMs around the $150 price point. They share a similar tuning and are a delight to listen to, but there are some differences when you compare them:

The Airoso offers a lusher, more “natural” sound with fuller bass and a smoother presentation, while the Aether focuses on detail and articulation, with a drier, more precise sound. Both excel in their own ways, but the Airoso emphasizes a warmer and more organic timbre, while the Aether prioritizes more clarity and detail.

Thanks for reading. You can support us by purchasing anything using any of our affiliate links.

.

Any purchase you make on Amazon or Linsoul with any of our affiliate links will give us a small provision at no cost to you.

We only get a provision for items that are not returned, so there’s no incentive for us to recommend something that’s not good.

Linsoul : Headphones, Earbuds, Wireless Earbuds, Desktop DAC/AMP, Portable DAC/AMP, Digital Audio Players,

Amazon: Headphones, IEMs, Headphone Amplifiers, Home Audio or Anything else.

.

If you enjoyed this article or other content on The Headphoneer, you might consider leaving a small donation to keep this website up and running. No donation is too small. Thanks for supporting us!

If you like our work please follow us on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter , it will help us grow. Sharing is caring 🙂

Written By

Chris founded The Headphoneer in 2013 after spending years going down the rabbit hole of searching for the perfect high fidelity headphones. Having gained experience with lots of gear and spent way too much time discussing on online forums he wanted to write the reviews he rarely encountered: Thorough reviews with lots of comparisons. This was also a way of putting his growing collection of gear to use for the benefit of humanity.